Delivery Capability Baseline Transformation for 2026

At a Glance

A delivery capability baseline clarifies governance, skills, tooling, data, controls, and vendor dependencies, quantifies gaps against target outcomes, and prioritizes remediation to enable predictable, risk-aligned transformation execution and measurable value realization.

Why an objective delivery baseline has become a strategic requirement

In 2026, banks rarely fail to define transformation ambition. They fail to convert investment into measurable value because delivery capability is assumed rather than evidenced. A delivery capability baseline addresses that gap by documenting the current performance state, identifying the constraints that cap throughput, and defining what must change in people, processes, and technology so delivery outcomes improve in a way that boards, regulators, and business leaders can recognize as durable.

The baseline is not a scorecard designed to label teams. It is a shared fact base that clarifies what is achievable in the next planning cycle and what is unrealistic without specific capability building. That distinction matters when portfolios include core modernization, risk and control remediation, data programs, and AI-driven operational change, all competing for the same scarce delivery capacity.

What “delivery capability” means without maturity language

Executives increasingly need baseline statements that can be tested through evidence. In practice, delivery capability is defined by whether the organization can repeatedly deliver safe change at predictable speed while maintaining control effectiveness and operational resilience.

Capability dimension	Baseline question	Evidence leaders should expect
Flow of value	How does value move from idea to production, and where does it stall?	End-to-end value stream maps with queue points, rework loops, and handoffs.
Speed and predictability	How long does change take, and how variable is the cycle?	Lead time distributions, not averages; commitment reliability; variance by product and platform.
Release throughput	How often can the bank deploy change safely?	Deployment frequency by domain; change success rate; rollback and hotfix patterns.
Quality and stability	Does speed come at the cost of incidents and customer harm?	Defect escape rates; production incident linkage to releases; service availability and recovery evidence.
Cost effectiveness	Is delivery improving unit economics, or expanding run costs?	Run-vs-change spend, automation coverage, decommissioning velocity, and productivity indicators tied to outcomes.
Governance and control	Can the bank prove that change is controlled and auditable?	Change controls, approvals, evidence pathways, segregation-of-duties adherence, and audit-ready logs.

A baseline is credible only when these dimensions can be evidenced across the estate, not just in a high-performing pocket.

Core phases of delivery capability baseline transformation

Delivery capability transformation works best when it follows a structured sequence: establish the baseline, define a target delivery model that is achievable, prove it with a small pilot, and then scale with internal enablement and governance integration.

Phase 1: Baseline assessment and discovery

The discovery phase establishes an objective snapshot of how delivery actually operates, including the bottlenecks that do not show up in org charts. The priority is to make constraints visible and measurable so the organization can decide what to fix first.

• Map value streams: document end-to-end flows, including governance gates, control evidence steps, and exception routes.
• Establish metrics: capture lead time, deployment frequency, cost effectiveness, and quality outcomes using consistent definitions.
• Map capabilities: visualize essential functions and dependencies across platforms and teams using capability mapping tools (for example, Ardoq-style approaches) to show where delivery relies on fragile handoffs or single points of failure.

Phase 2: Target definition and pragmatic goal setting

The target delivery model is not a generic best practice. It is a design that fits the bank’s risk profile, regulatory context, and capacity to adopt change. A realistic target is explicit about what will be standardized, what will remain differentiated, and which guardrails are non-negotiable.

• Phased roadmaps: sequence changes so that enabling capabilities (automation, observability, standard controls) precede high-dependency changes.
• Target architecture alignment: ensure platform and tooling choices support the delivery model (for example, stable CI/CD foundations, controlled configuration, and consistent environment governance).

Phase 3: Pilot implementation with 1–3 teams

A small pilot is the fastest way to convert delivery model theory into operational learning. The pilot should be chosen to be representative, not perfect, and it should be evaluated on measurable outcomes rather than subjective “agility” claims.

• Demonstrate measurable improvement in cycle time, change success rate, or incident reduction.
• Validate governance: prove that controls and evidence pathways work at speed.
• Refine the operating model: adjust roles, decision rights, and tooling based on real constraints.

Phase 4: Scaled rollout and capability building

Scale succeeds when the bank builds internal capability rather than relying indefinitely on external delivery support. Scaling also requires governance integration so that speed does not produce uneven control and resilience outcomes across the estate.

• Internal enablement: train internal coaches and create continuous improvement mechanisms to reduce dependency on external partners.
• Governance integration: define guardrails, shared metrics, and risk-based controls that enable speed with auditability.
• Standardization and reuse: reduce technical debt by converging on reusable patterns and baseline configurations where appropriate.

Critical success factors that determine whether the baseline changes outcomes

Organizations can collect delivery metrics and still fail to improve delivery. In 2026, three success factors consistently determine whether baselining leads to durable performance change.

Leadership behavior that protects truth telling

Delivery baselines are only as honest as the environment allows them to be. Leaders need the emotional discipline to review baseline performance without penalizing transparency. When teams expect the baseline to be used as a weapon, they optimize the narrative instead of the system, and the baseline becomes an exercise in selective reporting.

Standardization that reduces the cost of change

Standardization is often where banks recover delivery capacity. Returning platforms to baseline configurations (for example in ERP or workflow environments such as ServiceNow-style ecosystems) can reduce upgrade complexity, lower maintenance overhead, and improve reliability of automation and controls. The trade-off is that standardization requires active governance to avoid a return to bespoke customization that recreates technical debt.

Measurement discipline that ties delivery to business value

Baselining must connect delivery improvements to business outcomes that executives care about: cost-to-serve reduction, reduced loss rates, faster onboarding, improved recovery times, or lower remediation backlogs. If the baseline only measures activity (story points, hours, tickets) it will not support strategy validation. If it measures outcomes and the evidence trail, it becomes a portfolio decision instrument.

How an objective baseline supports strategy validation and prioritization

Delivery capability baselining is most valuable when it clarifies which strategic ambitions are feasible inside current constraints and which require prerequisite capability building. This makes prioritization more rational because it separates “important” initiatives from “executable now” initiatives. It also reduces the risk of starting too many high-dependency programs that will compete for the same scarce talent, test environments, and governance bandwidth.

As a result, the baseline should produce two outputs that executives can act on quickly: a constraint inventory (the few bottlenecks that cap throughput) and a sequencing view (the order in which capability improvements should be made so that downstream programs can succeed).

Building decision confidence in delivery baselines

Trade-offs in transformation portfolios are rarely technology-only. They are trade-offs between speed, safety, standardization, and control evidence. A structured digital maturity assessment provides a consistent way to evaluate delivery capability across teams and platforms without relying on vague maturity labels. Used alongside baseline metrics, this makes it easier for executives to compare initiatives, determine where delivery risk is concentrated, and decide what must be sequenced rather than run in parallel.

Applied in this context, DUNNIXER helps leaders connect the baseline to the operational realities that determine feasibility: value-stream bottlenecks, governance throughput, automation coverage, platform standardization constraints, and the ability to evidence controlled change. Executives use the results to improve readiness judgments and make clearer prioritization decisions through the DUNNIXER Digital Maturity Assessment.

References

• https://www.ardoq.com/knowledge-hub/business-capability-map
• https://www.ey.com/en_gl/alliances/servicenow/back-to-baseline
• https://www.tmforum.org/open-digital-architecture/capability-framework/#:~:text=The%20capability%20map%20can%20be,%2C%20processes%2C%20etc).
• https://isg-one.com/articles/agile-transformation-the-five-steps-to-building-an-agile-delivery-model#:~:text=Governance%20is%20established%20to%20address,from%20IT%20and%20the%20business.
• https://www.agilicist.com/delivery-transformation
• https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/criticality-good-governance-baseline-management-randy-spires-xqwoc#:~:text=Organization's%20Delivery%20Leadership%20%E2%80%93%20Critical%20to,shooting%20the%20messenger%2C'%20etc.
• https://internationaljournalcorner.com/index.php/ijird_ojs/article/download/135327/94453/325877#:~:text=A%20baseline%20is%20like%20a,are%20not%20the%20primary%20emphasis.
• https://www.migso-pcubed.com/blog/project-management-delivery/improving-delivery-capability-with-p3m3/#:~:text=all%20be%20included.-,2.,capability%20level%20has%20been%20achieved.
• https://www.ey.com/en_gl/alliances/servicenow/back-to-baseline#:~:text=Efficiency%20and%20cost%20savings%20*%20Ease%20of,required%20for%20ongoing%20maintenance%2C%20support%2C%20and%20troubleshooting.
• https://medium.com/@jon.martin_51817/how-an-organisation-functions-7-key-stages-of-iterative-transformation-9907e475476c#:~:text=Key%20Stage%205:%20Service%20Delivery,place%20and%20fit%20for%20purpose.
• https://www.ardoq.com/knowledge-hub/business-capability-map#:~:text=How%20Can%20Business%20Capability%20Maps,or%20to%20book%20a%20demo.
• https://www.agilicist.com/casestudies
• https://www.avolutionsoftware.com/our-resources/how-to-create-a-business-capability-map/#:~:text=Capability%20Based%20Planning%20&%20Roadmaps,to%20infrastructure%20are%20well%2Dinformed.
• https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/orchestrated-delivery-model-comprehensive-framework-scaling-younis-7aiqc#:~:text=Focus%20on%20acquiring%20talent%20and,capability%20building%2C%20not%20just%20delivery
• https://www.deloitte.com/be/en/services/consulting/research/erp-transformation-business-impact.html#:~:text=Realizing%20the%20true%20value%20of,aligning%20stakeholders%20on%20common%20objectives.
• https://scaleupmethodology.com/scaling/scaling-startups/continuous-delivery/agile-delivery/#:~:text=How%20do%20we%20measure%20the,most%20significantly%20impact%20business%20outcomes.
• https://www.agilicist.com/post/delivery-transformation-for-coos#:~:text=Charting%20the%20Course:%20Tangible%20Steps%20for%20COOs,start%2C%20pragmatically:%201.%20Baseline%20your%20delivery%20capability.
• https://bablocks.com/current-state-analysis/#:~:text=On%20larger%20initiatives%2C%20it%20becomes%20very%20important,performs%20is%20aimed%20at%20establishing%20this%20baseline.