Scoping Open Banking to Open Finance Programs in Banks for 2026

At a Glance

Open banking scope is now open finance: baseline in-bounds products, data, channels and third parties plus required control outcomes. Define four linked pillars—data access, payment initiation, consent, and resilient API operations—with metrics to govern safe expansion.

Why scope is now the hardest control in open finance

By 2026, open banking “scope” is no longer a narrow API enablement project for current accounts and payment initiation. The perimeter is widening into open finance, where product coverage can extend into insurance, pensions, investments, and mortgages, and where the bank must prove that sharing is safe, customer-directed, and operationally resilient. The governance challenge is that scope expansion increases the number of data elements, parties, and control points that must be consistent across jurisdictions and business lines.

Transformation governance should treat scope definition as an objective baseline: a documented statement of what is in-bounds (products, data sets, customer segments, channels, and third parties), the control outcomes required (security, privacy, availability, dispute handling), and the evidence artifacts that will be used to demonstrate progress over time. Without that baseline, open finance programs become a collection of disconnected API deliverables that cannot be governed against regulatory expectations or meaningful business outcomes.

Four pillars that define open banking program scope in 2026

Most 2026 open banking programs can be scoped into four interdependent pillars: read access, write access, consent management, and technical infrastructure. Treating these as separate delivery streams is a common failure mode; credible scoping defines how they reinforce each other and how gaps are prevented from becoming compliance and reputational events.

Data access

Read access scope covers the datasets and delivery characteristics that authorized third parties can access. Executives should require a clear catalog of exposed data elements (balances, transactions, product attributes), performance expectations (availability, latency), and restrictions (data minimization, purpose limitation) that can be traced to legal and policy requirements. As scope expands into open finance, this catalog must scale across product lines without fragmenting into inconsistent definitions.

Workstreams that should be explicitly in-scope include data standard mapping, semantic consistency (the meaning of fields across systems), exception handling for incomplete histories, and the evidence needed to demonstrate that customers receive consistent outcomes regardless of channel or product.

Payment initiation

Write access scope increasingly includes account-to-account transfers initiated by third parties. This adds operational and fraud risk that is qualitatively different from read-only sharing. Scoping decisions should define the payment types supported, transaction limits, risk controls (velocity and behavioral monitoring, step-up authentication), and dispute and recall workflows. Banks should also baseline settlement and reconciliation controls, because write scope failures are often detected after the fact through mismatched postings rather than through real-time monitoring.

Consent management

Consent management is the control plane for open finance: standardized experiences that allow customers to grant, limit, and revoke permissions at any time, with clear transparency on what data is shared and for what purpose. Scope must define how consent is represented, how it propagates across internal systems and APIs, and how revocation is enforced in real time. The governance dimension is evidence: supervisors and auditors will focus on demonstrable enforcement of consent, not just interface design.

In 2026 programs, the most important scoping boundary is the “end-to-end consent journey”: onboarding, re-authentication, renewal, revocation, complaint handling, and breach/incident communications, all supported by immutable logs that can be produced under scrutiny.

Technical infrastructure

Infrastructure scope typically includes API management, security controls, and operational runbooks. OAuth 2.0 patterns and strong customer authentication requirements shape identity and authorization design, but the modernization burden extends further: monitoring, rate limiting, anomaly detection, certificate and key management, and incident response integration become mandatory for scale. Executives should insist that the infrastructure scope includes service reliability engineering disciplines and a defined system of record for API events and consent events, because open finance failures are often “grey failures” that manifest as partial outages and inconsistent outcomes.

Regional landscapes: scoping for jurisdictional variance without fragmenting the platform

Open finance scope in 2026 is shaped by jurisdictional requirements that vary in both mandates and timelines. The strategic risk is building divergent implementations that increase cost and weaken governance, while the compliance risk is attempting a single global pattern that cannot satisfy local expectations. Executive scoping should therefore distinguish between (1) a common control and platform core and (2) jurisdiction-specific overlays.

European Union

The EU trajectory from open banking toward open finance expands product coverage and data access expectations. Scope should baseline which products and customer segments are in the initial compliance wave, how consent and entitlement policies will be managed, and how third-party onboarding and ongoing oversight will be evidenced. The platform core should remain consistent even as product catalogs expand.

United States

In the US, open banking is increasingly anchored in rulemaking rather than market norms. Scope decisions should prioritize durable evidence of authorization, security, and dispute handling, because supervisory review will focus on whether the bank can demonstrate consistent governance across aggregators, fintech partners, and customer channels. Banks should treat “data access plus operational controls” as inseparable parts of scope.

United Kingdom

The UK model continues to evolve toward broader smart data initiatives. The scoping implication is that open finance capabilities must be designed for extensibility: shared patterns for consent, identity assurance, and API productization that can be reused when new sectors and datasets enter scope.

Where open finance frameworks are mandatory, banks must balance compliance deadlines with safe delivery. Scope baselining should explicitly include readiness for supervisory engagement, third-party participation models, dispute resolution mechanisms, and evidence production that can be demonstrated under local expectations, while maintaining interoperability with global platform standards.

Strategic use cases: scoping beyond compliance without undermining control outcomes

By 2026, many banks aim to capture business value from open banking and open finance, but the pursuit of new revenue models can destabilize scope unless governance boundaries are explicit. The most effective programs scope use cases as controlled expansions that reuse core controls and evidence artifacts, rather than as bespoke product builds.

Banking-as-a-Service

BaaS scope requires clarity on product ownership, customer servicing responsibilities, and liability boundaries when non-financial brands distribute banking products. Executives should scope onboarding, KYC/KYB, authorization, and dispute handling as first-class workstreams, and ensure the evidence model can prove who did what, when, and under which consent and contractual terms.

Financial super apps and ecosystem plays

Super app scope expands the data perimeter and increases the risk of inconsistent entitlements. Governance should require a unified consent and entitlement model across services so that cross-product experiences do not become cross-product policy violations. Platform scope must include consistent logging and monitoring across integrated services to support both customer trust and supervisory defense.

Hyper-personalization and AI-driven decisioning

Using shared data to personalize offers or automate decisions introduces model risk and fairness considerations on top of privacy and security. Scope should include a clear boundary between “data access” and “data use”: which decisions may use open finance data, what explainability and testing is required, and how customers can understand and challenge outcomes. This prevents value extraction initiatives from creating hidden compliance exposure.

Operational efficiency through real-time data flows

Real-time data flows can reduce manual operations in reconciliation, credit processing, and servicing. Scope baselining should ensure that efficiency workstreams also include control outcomes: reduced error rates, improved detection of anomalies, and stronger audit trails. Efficiency without evidence is fragile in regulated environments.

Baselining metrics that make scope measurable over time

Open finance programs succeed when executives can separate activity from outcome. A baseline metric set should be small, comparable across jurisdictions, and tied to control objectives. This enables the governance cadence to track progress, spot drift, and make sequencing decisions with confidence.

• Consent enforcement integrity: percentage of revocations enforced within defined time thresholds, with audited proof of propagation
• API reliability for regulated journeys: availability and error rates for critical endpoints, segmented by TPP and product domain
• Security and fraud loss indicators: attempted and successful fraud rates for write scope, including step-up triggers and false positives
• Data quality and semantic consistency: defect rates in exposed data elements and mapping consistency across source systems
• Third-party governance performance: onboarding time, ongoing compliance checks, incident responsiveness, and termination effectiveness

Scope governance improves when each metric has an accountable owner, a defined evidence artifact, and an escalation threshold that triggers a scope or control decision rather than a prolonged remediation cycle.

Making scope decisions durable through transformation baselining

As open banking becomes open finance, the durable differentiator is not the number of APIs published but the strength of the bank’s control plane: consent, identity assurance, monitoring, dispute handling, and evidence production. Establishing an objective baseline across these domains allows executives to sequence expansion safely—adding products and use cases only when control outcomes and operational resilience are demonstrably ready.

Viewed through that lens, DUNNIXER Digital Maturity Assessment can be used to baseline maturity across the scope-critical capabilities described above—particularly consent governance, API operational resilience, third-party oversight, data quality stewardship, and the evidence model required for supervisory engagement. By linking each planned scope increment to a measurable maturity threshold, leadership teams can reduce confidence risk, avoid platform fragmentation across jurisdictions, and track progress over time against a single transformation baseline.

References

• https://stripe.com/resources/more/open-banking-explained#:~:text=Open%20banking%20is%20a%20financial,in%20payments%20and%20account%20management.
• https://www.openbankingtracker.com/open-banking-api#:~:text=Identity%20Verification%20%E2%80%94%20Verify%20customer%20identity,and%20revoke%20data%20sharing%20permissions
• https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e0feeef3-f107-4bed-8cd7-46db5a1f08e2#:~:text='Open%20banking'%20is%20an%20arrangement,the%20CBN%20regulatory%20sandbox);
• https://stripe.com/resources/more/open-banking-explained#:~:text=Open%20banking%20is%20a%20financial,and%20generate%20new%20revenue%20streams.
• https://www.digitalapi.ai/blogs/open-banking-trends
• https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/m1/en/strategic-foresight/sector-strategies/financial-sector-consulting/open-banking.html#:~:text=Open%20banking%20allows%20banks%20to%20acquire%20new%20customers%20and%20revenues,models%20and%20partnerships%20across%20industries.
• https://sbs-software.com/insights/mobile-banking-trends-innovation/#:~:text=The%20main%20mobile%20banking%20trends,ecosystems%20within%20a%20single%20app.
• https://www.fiorano.com/blogs/Why_Open_Banking_Is_Important#:~:text=Open%20banking%20APIs%20can%20enable,The%20API%20Economy
• https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/banking-regulation-2026#:~:text=For%20banks%2C%20consolidation%20presents%20both,opportunities%20and%20challenges%20for%20banks.
• https://thepaypers.com/regulations/expert-views/payments-and-fintech-regulation-whats-on-the-radar-for-2026#:~:text=DORA%20implementation%20is%20clearly%20the,and%20influence%20M&A%20due%20diligence.
• https://stripe.com/resources/more/what-is-open-finance-here-is-what-you-need-to-know
• https://www.wallarm.com/what/open-banking-explained-benefits-security-and-the-future#:~:text=Heightened%20Competitiveness:%20Open%20banking%20fuels,products%2C%20open%20banking%20stimulates%20innovation.
• https://softwaremind.com/blog/open-banking-providing-a-smooth-transition-from-legacy-to-future-ready-systems/#:~:text=For%20customers%2C%20open%20banking%20can,Open%20banking%20risks%20and%20challenges
• https://blog.axway.com/industry-insights/banking-finance/what-is-open-banking#:~:text=However%2C%20open%20banking%20enables%20more,which%20banks%20may%20find%20burdensome.
• https://www.betterask.erni/open-banking-and-open-finance-the-future-of-the-financial-world/#:~:text=The%20development%20of%20open%20banking,service%20and%20tailored%20financial%20solutions.
• https://www.digitalapi.ai/blogs/open-banking-trends#:~:text=Open%20banking%20at%20a%20glance%20in%202026,increased%20interest%20from%20consumers%2C%20fintechs%2C%20and%20banks.
• https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/eight-open-banking-trends-watch-2026-ellis-odynn-mba-3yeoc#:~:text=5.%20Open%20Finance%20Will%20Expand%20Beyond%20Banking,expanding%20data%20sharing%20beyond%20traditional%20banking%20products.
• https://www.sensedia.com/post/open-banking-threat-or-opportunity-sensedia#:~:text=The%20Open%20Banking%20initiative%20can%20involve%20various,aspects.%20However%2C%20four%20foundational%20pillars%20are%20essential:
• https://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt2403c.htm#:~:text=This%20differs%20from%20other%20jurisdictions%20such%20as,in%20some%20jurisdictions%20but%20not%20in%20others.